Foreign Views › Opinion

Mining puts spotlight on property claims on Mars

Can anyone claim the red planet or natural resources on asteroids?

Business leaders and legal experts say the question has become more than philosophical as a growing number of firms, often backed by capital and technology from Silicon Valley, have set their sights on the resources of outer space asteroids and Mars.

In order to avoid conflicts between competing companies and countries over outer space resources, more work needs to be done on Earth to determine who owns commodities taken from celestial bodies, analysts said.

“There is a huge debate on whether companies can simply travel to space and extract its resources,” said Barry Kellman, a law professor at DePaul University in Chicago.

“There is no way to answer the question until someone does it,” Kellman said.

US-based Planetary Resources, a firm backed by Google founder Larry Page and Virgin Group’s Richard Branson, expects to be mining asteroids for water in the next 10 to 15 years.

The company will launch its first robotic probe mission to scout asteroids for resource deposits in 2020, said Planetary Resources’ Chief Executive Chris Lewicki.

The firm plans to extract oxygen and hydrogen — the components of water — from asteroids to sell.

Lewicki is not planning on bringing those water resources back to Earth; he wants market them in space, creating a “gas station” for other exploration missions.

Hydrogen and oxygen, kept at a docking station orbiting around Earth, will be used to fuel other space ships.

Moving those fuels from Earth into outer space is expensive, he said, and having energy accessible to ships will make voyaging easier.

One modest sized asteroid, about as big as a football field, “has enough oxygen and hydrogen to fuel every launch in the history of space (travel),” Lewicki said.

“We are seeing a boom — that might be a bad choice of words — in access to space.” Other analysts are not sure if companies can just fly up and start harvesting cosmic water, legally speaking.

The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 is the main international standard for what companies and countries are allowed to do when they aren’t on earth, said Jacob Haqq-Misra, director of the Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, a Seattle-based research group.

The treaty says that space is the “provenance of all mankind.” Countries cannot claim “national appropriation” or sovereignty over the Moon or other celestial bodies “by occupation or by other means,” the treaty says.

This clause could prove tricky for private firms who want to mine on asteroids or Mars, said Haqq-Misra, including Planetary Resources and SpaceX, the private rocketship company run by tech billionaire Elon Musk.

“If SpaceX, a US corporation, was to claim asteroid profits as its own, there is some ambiguity as to whether that constitutes national appropriation,” Haqq-Misra said.

While the 1967 treaty is considered the global standard for sharing space, individual countries have recently passed laws allowing for property rights in the great beyond.

Luxembourg this month brought into force laws allowing private firms to own resources extracted from outer space in a move hailed by the nascent space mining industry.

The US in 2015 introduced similar legislation for private space resource ownership but it only applies to firms majority owned by Americans.

Under the United Nations’ Law of the Sea Convention countries have exclusive rights to exploit natural resources within around 200 miles (322 km) of their coast line, but ships and planes from other nations can freely pass through the waters. This could serve as a template for space resource rights, where companies have exclusive economic rights in a given area around their landing point, but not ownership over an entire asteroid or planet, lawyers said.

Chris Arsenault reports for the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

More StoriesLatest Opinion News

US tariff war hurts home industries, world trade


Making the business case for gender equality


Going down to grassroots makes officials more responsive to people’s basic needs